
Park City, Utah in Summer
The summer is flying by as it always does around here- in the fundraising software world, summer is the season of data conversions and implementations as organizations improve their infrastructure to prepare themselves for the fall fundraising season.
This summer has been no exception- and we easily broke our record for number of installations from last year. I’d like to think it has something to do with our easy to use software, but in reality, it really boils down to the great people we have in our client support services. These are the folks that make sure your LYBUNTS and SYBUNTS (oh my!) work correctly and that your incoming data is perfectly transferred into DonorPerfect.
I did have some time to attend the Giving Institute Summer Symposium in Park City, Utah in the middle of July. Park City in July is stunningly beautiful, and I regret I didn’t have more time to explore the outdoors as the sessions were simply too good to pass up. Sessions included the future of giving (especially related to capital campaigns), as well as the the role that technology plays in developing fundraising techniques. The discussion was spirited and genuine, and it was a unique experience I will not soon forget.
One of the discussion topics focused on Mobile Giving. As I mentioned in my post from February, Mobile Giving (in it’s current incarnation) should really only be pursued by a select few organizations. My beliefs were confirmed by the following blog post from Raymund Flandez who said:
Indeed, the National Wildlife Federation, which is running a mobile-giving campaign for animals affected by the Gulf oil spill, has recently pulled its text-to-donate message from its Web site. The reason? The Reston, Va., conservation group wants visitors to donate more — and not think that a $10 text gift is all they needed to give, officials say.
Clearly, if an organization as large as the NWF is having mixed results with mobile giving, then other organizations should be very careful before they dive in the same waters.
………
Recently, I also had an opportunity to raise funds for an organization I support, called Salute, Org. I blogged about it last month, and you can reach my personal fundraising page here: http://pcc2.donorpages.com/pcc3/jp2/.
Certainly, we’re encouraging everyone to use their social networks as much as possible – including Facebook and Twitter- but we knew that the number one tool to raise money would just be email. However, I decided to run a very non-scientific test, and wanted to see how many donations came from my Facebook posts, or from sending email.
The result? It’s not even a contest. Despite having 62 friends (and I have met all of them at one point or another), I have received exactly 7 things from these friends:
Zero, Zip, Natta, Nothing, Null, Nill, and Zilch.
Either I don’t have enough friends or they don’t have any money- either way it’s not good. Luckily, I sent out two email blasts to my address book (about 75 addresses), and received 8 donations totaling $530.00. I expect to raise another $300- will any of it be through Facebook? At this point, I really doubt it. What’s the lesson? Email works. It’s powerful and it’s much more meaningful than a status update on Facebook. People receiving email eventually have to respond (especially when you keep pestering them!), while on Facebook, it’s normal behavior to ignore status updates.
We’re actually in the process of embedding tracking widgets for incoming donations via Facebook. While I’m certain we are receiving at least some donations through Facebook, my gut is telling me it’s very few. For the vast majority of people, sending email will be the superior solicitation method for a long, long time.