May 26, 2010 | Categories Donor Management, Fundraising Strategies, Nonprofit News

Mind Your Manners!

Social Media Etiquette Header Image

Nonprofits Forget Etiquette on Social Media

If fundraisers are good at anything, it is remembering to say, “thank you!”  So why is it that nonprofits seem to lose all their manners and etiquette when it comes to social media?

Most of our offices have a rule, whether written or just generally understood, that a gift acknowledgement should go out within a day or two of receipt.  We do this because we know it shows appreciation, caring and respect.  We also understand that it builds a bond of loyalty.  And that donor loyalty equals sustained giving.  In short, it’s both good and profitable to be nice.

Always Say Thank You, at Every Opportunity, On Every Platform

Some fundraising legends have suggested that we need to thank more often and in more ways.  Fundraising lion Jerry Panas goes so far as to suggest that every gift of over $100 should be cause for a thank you by phone.  When challenged by already overworked fundraisers, he cheerfully asks, “what is a better use of your time?”

I agree.  And I thought we all did.  That is until I started spending more time on Twitter.

First of all, Twitter is a marvelous resource generally and a fantastic place for nonprofits specifically.  Contrary to its image as a forum where people report on what they had for lunch and other silly stuff,  Twitter is in fact home to 100 million people and organizations where rapid information exchange is made possible through an implicit social contract: You scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours.

How Should Nonprofits Treat Social Media Amplifiers

That means that my “tweet” or message, if of interest to my “followers,” will likely be “retweeted” or shared with many other people.  As people read my message, clicking through on links provided within it, I can both learn what truly interests the marketplace and I start to pick up more followers.  I learn and I earn.  If I post consistently and artfully, listening all the while, I can probably start acquiring a good number of these new friends and followers on my web site.  All of this, of course, at no cost.  You can see how this can be invaluable to a charity which wants to reach many new friends without spending much money.

But here’s the challenging part about social media.  What we don’t do is almost as important as what we do.

For example, if you are kind enough to Retweet my message, possibly earning my organization a few new friends, it might be a nice gesture to acknowledge your effort.  But only a small percentage of nonprofits take this little step.  And not doing so may convey the message that they are either not paying attention, think they are too busy or just don’t care.

Social Media Can Drive Huge Volumes of Traffic

Case in point:  One of the greatest social media experts on Twitter encouraged followers to make a contribution to her favorite charity to celebrate her birthday.  I was one of the many who did so, both out of appreciation for this person’s work in the field and because I approved of the charity’s work as well.  Although I had never met this person, I made a point of dropping a note to let her know about the gift.  No response.  However, I did find I was on a list of those who had given on one of her blog posts.  More than three weeks later, I received an acknowledgement from the charity via email.  Still, nothing from the “honoree.”

Of course, things get lost on our to-do lists and in cyberspace just as they do in the mail.  Knowing that this was likely an oversight, I decided to test acknowledgement practices with a variety of nonprofits on Twitter.  These included retweeting messages, posting message with links to their job announcements, notes of congratulations and other similar actions.

Nonprofits Don’t Thank for Social Media Exposure Enough

Fewer than 10% of any group of messages or actions were acknowledged.

That made me wonder if this experience was one unique to me—perhaps they just didn’t feel like responding to me personally—or if it had to do with the way nonprofit organizations were using social media.

To find out, I ran one last test:  I sent messages making reference to organizations where I have donated.  Since my Twitter handle is the same as that in their files, I knew they could identify me if they:

  1. saw the message,
  2. looked in their database, and
  3. had a policy of responding to donors.
Again, fewer than half of these charities responded, including two organizations which know that I have included them in my will.

Does your Nonprofit Have Social Media Etiquette Guidelines?

This would all seem to suggest that the charities on Twitter do not have an acknowledgement policy for social media, do not follow “mentions” of their organizations or both.

How simple a correction would be for nonprofits!  So here it is:

  1. Review your communications and gift acknowledgement policies and have them apply to social media as well, adapting them as necessary.
  2. Monitor “mentions,” which include the Twitter handle of the organization (e.g. @donorperfect or @gordonjayfrost) and respond as directed by your policy.

Believe it or not, this will not take much time to do on a regular basis.  Sadly, there are very few people on Twitter chatting up your organization today.  What we want is for more people to do so.  And to make that happen we can’t just rely on their good nature and luck.  We must do in social media what we do in every other aspect of fundraising: build the bond of constituent loyalty through a consistent patter of touches, including foremost among them acknowledgements.

Fundamentally, our donors and prospects should be treated with the same degree of courtesy whether in person, through the mail, on the phone or within the world of social media.  What we do—and don’t do—to show we care speaks volumes and will be likely reflected one day in the bottom line, too.

Written by Amanda Foran
  1. Rebecca Leaman permalink
    I wholeheartedly agree - and that 10% acknowledgement rate you mention is appallingly low! - but perhaps there are other factors at play, besides (a) busyness, (b) naiveté, (c) ineptitude, (d) lack of courtesy, (e) other? Twitter calls for a fine balance in content of tweets, as you know, and lately there almost seems to be a backlash against "Follow Friday" and "Thanks for the RT" tweets - both of which, admittedly, can come off as attention-seeking as much as courteous. Private messages may be appropriate for some cases, but in other cases - donations, for example - a timely and public acknowledgement is certainly called for. A list of names in a blog post may cut it if you're sure all your donors are also subscribers, but clearly that doesn't cut it for folks whose connection with you is through some other platform: Twitter, for instance. But then, if you tweet your thanks, is there a risk of annoying more followers than you're rewarding? I just don't know... but I'm sure glad you launched this discussion! Looking forward to reading others' thoughts about how to balance social media with old-school manners!
  2. Cherita Smith permalink
    Thank you for this post! This is something that I've definitely noticed, and it's been bugging me a lot lately. I've started going through and changing who I'm following because I'm tired of non-responsive organizations taking space in my stream (I make exceptions for the interesting, informative or funny. many aren't). In fact, I just mentioned the lack of response by nonprofits in a post I wrote today -- after reading this, I immediately went back to include your post. So thanks again!
  3. Marlene Oliveira permalink
    On a note related to manners, I notice a number of nonprofits forgetting that it's rude to always have your hand out in social media. There are some stellar examples of organizations that are committed to providing *value* on Twitter and not just asking, asking, asking for donations. However, the are some noticeable nonprofits who are guilty of only participating in the space when they have something to promote or are asking for donations. Perhaps these are the same folks who are forgetting about ongoing stakeholder communications in other channels as well.
  4. Robyn McIntyre permalink
    I do at least one post a day where I thank everyone in general for their RTs, mentions, links, and conversation. I do it this way because I discovered early on that people felt obligated to say "you're welcome" and I didn't want them wasting their limited Twitter api access on that. If the RT was accompanied by a personal comment, I RT back as soon as I see it. In the case you mentioned above, I would definitely have sent a reply thank you. All that said, I am a consultant rather than a nonprofit and I would agree that NPs should be quick to thank anyone for mentions or RTs. In fact, it would be a good idea to RT the RT with thank you included, so you get an extra mention.

Leave a Reply

Note: XHTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS